You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Another tricky little question :S
I wasn't really sure where I was going with this so I decided to just dive right in and differentiate:
As for the second part of the first proof, I'm pretty stumped. We know that k > 0, so for k < 1, k - 1 will be negative and an element of the set of real numbers between 0 and 1 (exclusive). In other words:
So you will have a fraction and the exponent of x will not be an integer. Whereas, for k > 1 you will have a positive exponent, which may be an integer and may, in fact, be any positive real number. That's the closest thing to a brainwave I've had really - do you have any ideas?
Last edited by Au101 (2015-02-18 11:29:51)
Offline
[list=*]
[*]
This is < 0 when k < 1 and > 0 when k > 1.
Bassaricyon neblina
Offline
Perfect! thank you!
Offline
I was wondering if anybody could suggest a starting point for the second proof, just to get me going
Offline
Okay, so I've been experimenting with this a little bit and I think I have the answer, but I'm not quite sure I'm laying this out properly (or, to be honest, that I'm right). What do you think?
Last edited by Au101 (2015-02-19 14:39:50)
Offline
Offline
Pages: 1