You are not logged in.
OK. If you really want to work from y. I'll demonstrate one value for y and maybe you can do the other.
Say
times top and bottom by an amount that eliminates the square root from the bottom
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Thanks, now I have one more part I need to compute
Last edited by evene (2015-11-22 10:54:45)
Offline
Hi;
How did you do on the last part?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Define "How did I do on the last part?"
What last part?
Offline
now I have one more part I need to compute
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Need help with these high degree difficult problems:
(1) Simplify
(2) Write
in summation notation(3) Prove that any 2 consecutive Fibonacci numbers
and are relatively prime(4) Find the sum of the infinite series
Offline
Haven't worked on yet bobby! After all, school is my main priority
For (1) I think I have it:
And whatever that equals. I am mentally getting about
Offline
Happy Thanksgiving to whoever is reading this and whoever is in the US!
Offline
Hi;
1)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Ok that... looks complicated... Is it computation problem? (For my post)
Last edited by evene (2015-11-23 12:57:09)
Offline
I used the summation calculus, it is complicated. Look for an easier way, now that you have the answer.
4)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Can you do it in a much easier method? Like, without all of the
symbols?Offline
4)
This is called a geometric series and there is a formula for them but I like the following trick.
Now just add and subtract the remaining fractions.
Can you do it in a much easier method?
There are lots of easier ways.
Like, without all of the
symbols?
The sigma or big E is the symbol for summation. It is not as common as the integral sign is but it is just as important. You will encounter it often, get used to it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thanks! Hey Bob! Can you link the Sum symbol website on the Math is Fun website below when you get back out? Thanks!
Thanks Bobbym for the explanation on Q4! I'll just search up the formula for the Geometric Sequence!
Offline
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thanks Bobbym! You probably spent a lot of time working on these questions! Now we need Q3
Offline
Hi;
I have nothing cleverer than this already worked proof which makes use of two properties of the GCD.
Let GCD(m,n) = (m,n)
1) (m,n)=(n,m)
2) (m,n)=(m+kn,n) where k is an integer.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … vely-prime
But before you go there I suggest you work on the proof yourself until you have exhausted all possibilities that you can think of.
Thanks Bobbym! You probably spent a lot of time working on these questions!
It did not take me a long time, the methods of experimental math (EM) knocked them all off in under a minute apiece. It took much longer to latex them up and try to replace concise computation with verbose classical math jargon and methods. This ain't because I am some kind of big brain, it is because EM makes short work of school problems. Funny thing is that it also works better on real world problems too, suggesting that the universe is some sort of classroom or school?!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Interesting...
Offline
This problem though... Seems impossible
Last edited by evene (2015-11-25 02:42:29)
Offline
ABCD = 1089.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I figured out that 9=10-1, so replacing 9 with that gives us ABCD0-ABCD=DCBA. Then use logic
Offline
Or you can let your machine use logic and you go sailing...
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I have a question on this:
How can this be factored by grouping?
Last edited by evene (2015-11-25 14:24:00)
Offline
hi evene,
Like this:
To get those squared terms there must be two factors each with an x term and a y term. To get minus y squared one must have a minus sign. So it would take the form:
(x + y + a)(x - y +b) for some numbers a and b. That also accounts for no xy term.
So that makes
x^2 - xy + bx + yx - y^2 + by + ax - ay + ab.
From the x coefficients b + a = -6 and from the y coefficients b - a = 4
That's enough to fix a and b. Adding gives 2b = -2 so b = -1 and so a = -5.
This gives ab = 5 which is just what we wanted, so here's the factorisation:
(x + y -5)(x - y - 1)
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Thanks Bob. I realized that you could also do that by completing the square, then subtracting the same amount that you added
Offline