You are not logged in.
The StackExchange. They have a big math forum there.
I do not understand 1), can you show an example of what you mean?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
for example suppose my set is 1 1 2 2. if second switch fails the set turn to 1 3 2. there is 1 switch less than or equal to 2^0, two switch LE 2^1 and 3 switches LE 2^2. so first condition is satisfied. Second condition is also satisfied. So, it works.
Now, suppose third switch fails; the set will be 1 1 4. there is 1 switch LE 2^0, two switch LE 2^1 and 3 switches LE 2^2. so first condition is satisfied. But since 4>6/2. this series cannot provide all levels ( numbers between 1 to 6).
Since I have develop this method by thinking and try&error, I am not sure about it. Please inform me if this method has any defect. Thank you
Offline
I will need to think about this for a while. I will have more questions tomorrow.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Done!
Offline
Please post the solution.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline