You are not logged in.
Inside a square E there are 2 smaller squares A and B ,both with length of sides being 1/2 of that of E. Both squares
can move freely inside E, but must keep "parallel " with E. If a point is chosen randomly on E , find the probability that the point lies inside A and B at the same time.
Last edited by mr.wong (2016-01-24 15:50:41)
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thanks bobbym , you are right .
By formula , we have the probability of the point lies
within the axis of 1 side ( say horizontal side ) of the
common portion of A and B to be 1/3 . Similarly ,
for the vertical side , P also = 1/3 . Thus combinely
P of the point lies within both A and B will be 1/9 .
Will the answer be the same for other polygons , say
rhombus under similar conditions ?
Offline
Hi;
You mean with sides that are 1 / 2 of E?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
I mean that the word " square " is replaced by " rhombus ",
others remain unchanged in the original post .
Last edited by mr.wong (2016-01-27 20:53:47)
Offline
Now let us consider triangles :
Inside a triangle E there are 2 smaller similar triangles
A and B , both with length of relative sides being 1/2 of
that of E . All the 3 triangles are parallel with vertices upwards .A and B can move freely inside E , but must keep parallel with E .If a point is chosen randomly on E ,
find the probability that the point lies inside A and B at the same time .
Offline
Hi;
There are several ways to have vertices upward, which do you want? Are these equilateral triangles?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
The triangles are not necessarily equilateral , just any 3 similar
triangles. Any 1 of the 3 vertices may do , just that the triangles are parallel .(i.e. for all the 3 corresponding sides )
Offline
Then how do we know that the answer will not depend on the shape of the triangle chosen?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
Since the 3 Δs are similar , the result should be
the square of the ratio of any 1 side of the
expectation of common portion of A and B with
the corresponding side of E .
Offline
Hi;
I could be making some giant mistake but everything keeps pointing to 1 / 10 as the probability. Of course I had to assume that what works for one triangle ( in this case I used a right triangle with sides of 1 and 1) is gonna work for them all.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
I think that whenever A , B and E are similar figures ( nomatter squares , rhombuses or Δs ) and in parallel position , and with the same proportion of corresponding
sides ( i.e. 1/2 ) , the probability required will remain the
same , i.e. 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/9 .
Offline
I will recheck and if necessary post it to the mathematica gurus but simulations are not confirming your conjecture.
This is what I am simulating.
The red and blue triangles are 1 / 2 the length of the larger outer triangle and they can move anywhere inside the largest triangle. The bases stay parallel to the largest one and they are similar triangles.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
I have to emphasize that not only the bases ,but in fact all the 3 sides of the Δs stay parallel . Otherwise if you turn 1 of the smaller Δ by 90 degree anti-clockwisely ( it seems possible ) then only 2 of the 3 sides remain parallel .
Last edited by mr.wong (2016-02-07 15:53:47)
Offline
Related problem ( I ) : To find the volume of a polyhedron
Let X denotes a polyhedron with 6 vertices PQRSTU ,
11 sides and 7 faces :
(1) base PQRS being a square with sides 1/2 unit .
(2) Δ PTS with PT = 1/12 unit ( in fact sq.unit)
where TP is perpendicular to the base .
(3) Δ PTQ being congruent to Δ PTS .
(4) Δ RUQ with RU = 1/8 unit ( or sq.unit )
where RU is perpendicvlar to the base .
(5) Δ RUS being congruent to Δ RUQ .
(6) Δ TQU .
(7) Δ TSU being congruent to Δ TQU .
How to find the volume of X ?
Offline
Hi;
Yes, I have simulated the condition that all three sides are parallel. I got an answer of about 1 / 10. I am currently moving and there is much confusion because management is inept. I will be a bit slow in replying for a while.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym , wish you will have a smooth move !
Now let us continue to the polyhedron X :
If we cut X into 2 halfs at TU , we get 2 pyramids .
Let us choose the left one PRUTS , denoted by Y . We may
treat Y as a pyramid having 5 faces with PRUT ( being a trapezium ) as base , and S as vertice .
We may find that PR = √1/2 unit ; ST = √ 37/144 unit ;
SU = √ 17/64 unit and UT = √ 289/576 unit .
The area of base PRUT may also be found as
√1/2 * 5/48 sq.unit .
How to find the height of the pyramid Y so that we can
calculate the volume of Y ?
Offline
I would like to go back to the sliding triangles first for several reasons:
1) Are answers did not coincide.
2) My simulation techniques were not fast enough.
These need to be addressed.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
In fact the problem of the polyhedron is much related
to that of the 3 Δs , perhaps we can obtain the
same result through different ways .
In polyhedron Y ,since trapezium PRUT and Δ PRS are mutually
perpendicular , thus the height of the pyramid is in fact the
height of Δ SPR .
Let SW denotes the height meeting PR at W ,
in fact SW = PW = WR = 1/2 PR = 1/2 √1/2 unit .
Now we can calculate the volume of Y :
V = 1/3 * 1/2 √1/2 * √1/2 * 5/48 cu. unit
= 5/ 576 cu.unit
Thus V of X = 5/ 288 cu. unit
Thus the average height ( expected area ) on PQRS
= ( 5/288)/ ( 1/4 ) sq.unit
= 5/72 sq.unit
The above value denotes the expectation of the common
portion of the 2 smaller Δs in # 13 , thus the probability
required = (5/72)/(1/2) = 5/36 ( about 0.14 )
Offline
I am unable to verify that experimentally at the moment. I am still getting 1 / 10.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
I made some mistakes in finding the volume of
the polyhedron in the past 3 posts . Now I shall
start again from the beginning and use your diagram
in #13 as reference .
Let X denotes a polyhedron with 6 vertices PQRSTU and 7 faces .
(1) base PQRS being a square with sides 1/2 unit .
(2) Δ PTS with PT = 1/3 unit where TP is perpendicular to the base .
(3) Δ PTQ being congruent to Δ PTS .
(4) Δ RUQ with RU = 1/2 unit where RU is perpendicular to the base .
(5) Δ RUS being congruent to Δ RUQ .
(6) Δ TQU .
(7) Δ TSU being congruent to Δ TQU .
In fact PT denotes the expectation of the length
of the common portion of the bases of the 2
smaller Δs ( the red and blue ) when the distance
of their bases with the base of the large Δ are
fixed to be 0 during moving in parallel direction ,
while RU denotes the expectation of the length
of the common portion of the bases of the 2
smaller Δs when the distance of their bases
with the base of the large Δ are fixed to be 1/2
unit .
By formula we find that PT = 1/3 unit while RU is
fixed to be 1/2 unit .
In this case UT will be a straight line ( linear )
otherwise it may be a curve of 2nd order if it
represents certain areas etc .
The polyhedron represents the distribution of data
of various expectation of the common portion of
the bases of the 2 smaller Δs according to the
various distances of their bases with the large Δ .
If we divide the volume of X by its base , we
get the overall expectation .
To find the volume of X , it may be easier to cut
X into 2 halfs at TU and get a pyramid Y .
The base of Y is a trapezium PRUT with PT // RU ,
since the height of the trapezium PR = √1/2 unit ,
∴ the area of PRUT may be found to be
( 1/3 + 1/2 ) / 2 * √1/2 = √1/2 * 5/12 sq.unit .
( If UT is a curve instead of a straight line , then the
area of PRUT should be found by integration if
we know its equation .)
Since trapezium PRUT and Δ PRS are mutually
perpendicular , thus the height of the pyramid is
in fact the height of the Δ SPR .
Let SW denotes the height meeting PR at W ,
in fact SW = PW = WR = 1/2 PR = 1/2 √1/2 unit .
Now we can calculate the volume of Y :
V = 1/3 * 1/2 √1/2 * √1/2 * 5/12 cu. unit
= 5/ 144 cu.unit
∴ V of X = 5/ 72 cu. unit
Thus the average height on PQRS
= ( 5/72)/ ( 1/4 ) unit
= 5/18 unit
The above value denotes the expectation of
the base of common portion ( also a similar
and parallel Δ ) of the 2 smaller Δs in # 13 .
Thus the probability required
= (5/18)*(5/18) = 25/324 ( about 0.077 )
Offline
Perhaps we can find the probability in another way .
In the diagram of #13 let the coordinates of the large Δ
denoted by (0,0) ( 1,0) and ( 0,1) , and let the 2 smaller Δs
denoted by A and B . Their vertices at right angle will be
represented by VA and VB . It is clear that both VA
and VB lie within the Δ (denoted by D) with coordinates (0,0) (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) or intersections of the 3 lines with equations
(i) y=0 ; (ii) x=0 and (iii) x+y = 1/2 .
If a point is chosen randomly inside D , what will be the expected
values of its coordinates ?
Offline
Let us try to solve the original problem step by step from special case to general case .
Let (a1,a2) denotes the coordinate of VA and (b1,b2) denotes the coordinate of VB .
Suppose a2 = b2 , i.e A and B have same distance with the base of the large Δ .
The length of the base of the similar Δ formed by overlapping A and B
will be 1/2 - [ max ( a1,b1 ) - min ( a1,b1 )] i.e. 1/2 - |a1-b1| ( absolute value )
Since both a1 and b1 lie between 0 and 1/2 , thus |a1-b1| also lie between
0 and 1/2 . We can find the expected value of 1/2 - |a1-b1| by solid
geometry .
Let PQRST denotes a pyramid with base PQR being a Δ where PQ
= 1/2 unit ( length of |a1-b1| ) while PR = 1/2 unit ( range of a2 or b2 : also from
0 to 1/2 ) . RPTS being a square with length 1/2 unit , where PT denotes the value of
1/2 - |a1-b1| = 1/2 since |a1-b1| = 0 when both a1 = b1 = 0 .
Similarly RS = 1/2 when a1 = b1 = 0 with a2 and b2 = 1/2 .
To calculate the volume of the pyramid we treat the square as base with
Q as the vertex .
Since V = 1/3 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/24 cu.unit
Since the area of the original base Δ PQR = 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/8 sq.unit
Thus the average height ( expected value of 1/2 - |a1-b1| ) = 1/3 unit .
Thus the area of the similar Δ formed by overlapping A and B will be
1/3 * 1/3 * 1/2 sq.unit , dividing by the area of the large Δ being 1*1*1/2
sq.unit , we get the probability required = 1/9 .
Nextly we shall find what will be the result if a2 ≠ b2 .
Offline
It might be 1 / 9 but I would like the theory and the simulation to agree.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym ,
I apologize that I had made mistakes again in the last post .
Under the condition of a2 = b2 , the probability required should
be 5/12 * 5/12 = 25/144 ( about 0.17)
I am not sure which answer provided by me is correct , or may
be all wrong .
It seems it is impossible to solve this problem by solid geometry ,
for there are too many variables thus out of the capacity of solid
geometry . Perhaps this problem may be solved by multiple integration
which I am not familiar . Thus I shall postpone to discuss this problem
for myself , but wish someone skilful in multiple integration may find a solution for it .
Later I shall discuss various related problems other than triangles .
Offline