You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Each and every side of an equilateral triangle (60-60-60 triangle) is equal to (10/ square root 2). When finding the height of the equilateral triangle, I assume that it's suffice we divide the equilateral triangle into two halves. Both halves are congruent to each other and we find that they are both 30-60-90 triangles. What I am trying to figure out is how exactly would I be able to find the length opposite of the 60 degree angle and the length opposite of the 30 degree angle given that the side opposite of the 90 degree angle is (10/ square root 2).
All help is appreciated!
Why not try SOHCAHTOA or Pythagoras for the length opposite the 60 degree angle which is the height of the triangles?
The length opposite the 30 degree angle is defined in your problem.
The side opposite the 90 degree angle is called the hypotenuse
Why did you delete your post? Please do not do that.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
If the original sides of an equilateral triangle is (10/ square root 2) and I divide the equilateral triangle into halves, would I divide
(10/ square root 2) / 2 to obtain the new length for one of the sides in the 30-60-90 triangle (the side opposite of the 30 degree angle)? Then continue on with the Pythagorean theorem?
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
That is how you would get the base of one of your two congruent triangles, You already know what the hypotenuse is so Pythagoras can be used.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I know that the answers to this question are: a height of (5 square root 6 / 2). However, I don't quite understand how this answer was obtained. There isn't much of an explanation in the book I have.
Also, I am in a section where everything is based solely on geometry, so I find that it wouldn't be quite necessary to use socahtoah as it would be more suitable for a trig problem. I know that the Pythagorean theorem is one of the options I can choose in solving this problem, however, I only have difficulties with solving it because of having a square root involved in the problem.
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 19:28:38)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
What do you not understand?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
How the height and (new) base were obtained step by step.
(Primarily the height)
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 21:55:48)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
Do you know what the Pythagorean theorem says:
a^2 + b^2 = c^2 where a can be the height, b can be the base and c is the hypotenuse.
Are you clear up to here?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
How did you get the 5 / square root 2? Did you just divide 10 / square root 2 by 2?
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 19:27:24)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
I got it from right here in your OP.
I assume that it's suffice we divide the equilateral triangle into two halves.
I did not question it back then to prevent more confusion.
When you divide
by 2 you getIt just so happens that is correct but it is a bit loose to say that. You would need a proof that when you drop a perpendicular line through the apex of your equilateral triangle it divides the base in half.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Well that explains quite a bit! Would it be correct to subtract (5 / square root 2)^2 from both sides of your previous equation, and come up with h^2 = (10 / square root 2)^2 - (5 / square root 2)^2 to obtain the height of the triangle? And if so, how would I continue with solving it? I have difficulties at this point.
Also, if the sides of an equilateral triangle were 20 / square root 2 and I halved it, would the new base of the 30-60-90 triangles be 10 / square root 2?
(Just checking to see if I have a full understanding of this)
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 19:46:44)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
You would need a proof that when you drop a perpendicular line through the apex of your equilateral triangle it divides the base in half.
Let us assume that this is true for the moment...
You want to solve this:
Clean up the squares:
Do you understand up to here?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes! I follow through by canceling out the square roots of the two's and then multiplying the numerators by themselves. Thus, we obtain the new numbers of 25/2 and 100/2. 100/2 = 50. Subtract both sides by 25/2. h^2 = 50 - (25/2). h^2 = 75/2. h = square root (75 / 2) or square root 75 / square root 2. Am I correct so far?
(I should have left the 100/2 as it was)
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 19:58:58)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
Clean up the squares:
Multiply everything by 2:
Which can be simplified a bit more.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Awesome! So now that we have found h = square root (75/2). How would the process of simplifying work out? I am a bit confused when approaching this step.
I continued forth by simplifying the square root 75 into square root 25 and square root 3. The square root 25 became 5 and so I came up with an answer of (5 square root 3 / square root two). However, the final answer is supposed to be 5 square root 6 / 2.
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 20:34:30)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
One idea is:
Which can be further simplified...
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
So . . .
5 square root 3 times square root 2 / square root 2 times square root 2
5 square root 6 / square root 4
5 square root 6 / 2!
Thanks for helping me solve this lengthy problem bobbym!
Last edited by mathisfun_user (2016-05-16 20:25:39)
Without mathematics, there's nothing you can do. Everything around you is mathematics. Everything around you is numbers - S. Devi
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality - A. Einstein
Offline
Now we have to deal with the only assumption made here:
I assume that it's suffice we divide the equilateral triangle into two halves.
One of the properties of an equilateral triangle:
In an equilateral triangle, the median, angle bisector, and altitude are equal.
We are done.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1