You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Regarding group conditions, all books say closure, associativity, same identity (left-side, right-side i.e a*e = e*a =a) are required. But about inverse they differ. Some books say, for every element a, there should be an element such b that a*b = e where e is identity element. But some other say that for every element a there should be such that a*b =e. Without mentioning that b*a also should be e,. b*a = e is it not required. Can it be derived from other properties?
Last edited by Seetha Rama Raju Sanapala (2016-10-25 05:54:28)
Offline
hi Seetha Rama Raju Sanapala
I think it can. Does this work?
Let b be the right inverse of a.
I have left out some associativity steps to make the proof simpler.
(ba)(ba) = b(ab)a = bea = ba
Let c be the right inverse of ba
(ba)(ba)c = (ba)c
(ba)e = e
ba = e
So b is a left inverse of a.
Note: Every other property of the group is required for this.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1