You are not logged in.
1) Find all integers
for which is an integer.Offline
For (3), no immediate ideas come to mind, except for plug in each point separately into
and solve the system.EDIT: Doing so, we get the system as
Which has solutions
. Thus, the cubic is and .I probably got this wrong though. Mind to check over?
Last edited by evene (2016-11-26 13:37:50)
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hi dazzle1230
Q2. (-2,3) is certainly the lowest point. Maybe it never reaches 5; just tends to it. Try an open interval at the right hand end.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Thank you! I also have two other problems I need help on:
1) Find a polynomial f(x) of degree 5 such that both of these properties hold: f(x)-1 is divisible by (x-1)^3 and f(x) is divisible by x^3
2)
Part 1:
Let f(x) and g(x) be polynomials.
Suppose f(x)=0 for exactly three values of x: namely, x=-3,4, and 8.
Suppose g(x)=0 for exactly five values of x: namely, x=-5,-3,2,4, and 8.
Is it necessarily true that g(x) is divisible by f(x)? If so, carefully explain why. If not, give an example where g(x) is not divisible by f(x).
Part 2:
Generalize: for arbitrary polynomials f(x) and g(x), what do we need to know about the zeroes (including complex zeroes) of f(x) and g(x) to infer that g(x) is divisible by f(x)?
Thank you in advance!!!
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hi dazzle1230
Q2. Parts 1 and 2
Initially, I'm assuming real values only
Here's a possible example to consider:
If values can be complex then the (x² +2) and (x^4+7) terms would not exist since these would also give rise to zeros, and we're told the only zeros are as given.
But, for example, f could have a factor (x+3)^2 and still satisfy the requirements.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
hi dazzle1230
But, for example, f could have a factor (x+3)^2 and still satisfy the requirements.
Bob
Then f will have 4 factors.(-3 twice)
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
Suppose f(x)=0 for exactly three values of x: namely, x=-3,4, and 8.
Number of factors and number of zeros are not the same thing.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi;
I am forced to agree with bobbym on this one. His motto, "that even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while," is right on this one. He has the polynomial answer, I saw it when I peeked at his work while he was eating. Is that unethical? Certainly not...the ole fellow would just say RIPOSTP.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Suppose f(x)=0 for exactly three values of x: namely, x=-3,4, and 8.
Number of factors and number of zeros are not the same thing.
Bob
I think they are 2 zeroes superposed one over the other.
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
How would we use the fundamental theory of algebra to prove problem 2?
Offline
Hi dazzle1230,
How did you solve prob (1) of #5?
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
Yes, I got 6x^5-15x^4+10x^3
Thanks!
Last edited by dazzle1230 (2016-12-03 06:29:31)
Offline
and for part one of the second problem, I said that g(x) has to be divisible by f(x):
g(x)=a(x+5)(x+3)(x-2)(x-4)(x-8)
f(x)=b(x+3)(x-4)(x-8)
Once we divide f(x) from g(x) and simplify the quadratic, we get that (a/b)x^2+3x10...is that correct?
If so, how do we proceed part 2 of the problem?
Last edited by dazzle1230 (2016-12-03 05:31:22)
Offline
Hi;
That is correct!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
The first problem or the second one?
Offline
This one.
Yes, I got 6x^5-15x^5+10x^3
Thanks!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Is my reasoning for the second problem correct?
Offline
The fact that Remainder equals zero means that f(x) | g(x).
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I'm not sure how to do part 2 though. Do we need the fundamental theorem of algebra?
Offline
Part 2... I do not know how.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
and for part one of the second problem, I said that g(x) has to be divisible by f(x):
g(x)=a(x+5)(x+3)(x-2)(x-4)(x-8)
f(x)=b(x+3)(x-4)(x-8)
Once we divide f(x) from g(x) and simplify the quadratic, we get that (a/b)x^2+3x10...is that correct?
If so, how do we proceed part 2 of the problem?
I do not know the technicalities but is it not necessary that a has to be divisible by b also?
In my opinion the coefficient of highest degree in f(x) must be divisible by the coefficient of highest degree in g(x) and f(x) should contain all the zeroes of g(x) ,even the repeated ones.
Last edited by thickhead (2016-12-03 18:37:42)
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline
Yes, I got 6x^5-15x^4+10x^3
Thanks!
Can you illustrate the method in detail?
{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}
Offline