You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Let $A, B$ and $C$ be points in $3$-space:
[asy]
size(200);
import three;
currentprojection = orthographic(3, 1, 0.5);
real big = 6;
triple O = (0,0,0);
triple X = (1, 0, 0);
triple Y = (0, 1, 0);
triple Z = (0, 0, 1);
triple A = (0, 2, -1);
triple B = (2, 0, 3);
triple C = (3, -1, 5);
draw(O--big*X, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
draw(O-- -big*X, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
draw(O-- big*Y, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
draw(O-- -big*Y, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
draw(O-- big*Z, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
draw(O-- -big*Z, Arrow3(size = 0.2cm));
label("$x$", big*X, S);
label("$y$", big*Y, S);
label("$z$", big*Z, W);
dot("$A$", A, S);
dot("$B$", B, S);
dot("$C$", C, S);
[/asy]Prove that if $A, B$ and $C$ are collinear, then
\[\overrightarrow{A}\times \overrightarrow{B} + \overrightarrow{B}\times \overrightarrow{C} + \overrightarrow{C}\times \overrightarrow{A} =\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}.\]
I'm stuck, can anyone explain how to solve this?
"If we wanna be great, we can't just sit on our hands" - 2017 NFL Bears draft
Offline
hi !nval!d_us3rnam3
Not able to follow your diagram instructions but it looks like this is just
" Prove that A = (0, 2, -1); B = (2, 0, 3); C = (3, -1, 5); are collinear. "
Sufficient to show vector AB = a multiple of vector BC as these go in the same direction and have a point in common.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
No, that's not really the question.
I'm trying to prove that for some collinear points A, B, and C,
Last edited by !nval!d_us3rnam3 (2019-07-03 11:29:47)
"If we wanna be great, we can't just sit on our hands" - 2017 NFL Bears draft
Offline
hi !nval!d_us3rnam3
That's much clearer. I wonder why your first post just looks like code to me. When I want maths expressions I use LaTex. Mostly that works ok. You have to start your code with square brackets math and end with square brackets /math. Does your first post look ok to you? Maybe you have some software on your machine that displays it for you. I'd like to try and get to the bottom of this for future posters.
Anyway, back to your question. Those 'x' signs must be cross products (also called vector products). You can read about them here:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/vect … oduct.html
and there's a calculator here:
https://www.symbolab.com/solver/vector- … pmatrix%7D
When you use that three times for the three products you get:
(6i -2j -4k) (3i - j -2k) and (-9i +3j +6k)
These add up to (0, 0, 0) as required.
Hope that's what you wanted.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Not really, actually. I'm looking for a proof of that for any collinear points A, B, and C. If you could show me that, that would be great.
Last edited by !nval!d_us3rnam3 (2019-07-04 13:27:45)
"If we wanna be great, we can't just sit on our hands" - 2017 NFL Bears draft
Offline
Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding. I can do that too.
To save time with typing I'm going to leave out the overlines on the vectors.
If A, B and C are colinear then AB = kBC => AO + OB = k(BO + OC) which re-arranges to OA = kOB + OB -kOC
So AxB + BxC + CxA becomes
(kOB + OB -kOC) x OB + OB x OC + OC x (kOB + OB - kOC) = -k (OC x OB) + (OB x OC) + k x (OC x OB) + (OC x OB) = 0
Hope that is finally what you want.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Yes, it is, thank you.
Coud you explain your last line a bit further? How did you get there?
"If we wanna be great, we can't just sit on our hands" - 2017 NFL Bears draft
Offline
I have made use of the following:
i x i = j x j = k x k = 0
i x j = k j x i = -k and four more like these.
CO = - OC etc.
I've just realised that using k for the multiplier was a poor use of symbol. Sorry if that is confusing. Fortunately I haven't actually used k as a unit vector in my proof, so all the ks are multipliers.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1