You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hello,
I am having trouble understanding the steps of deriving the above mentioned functions. I know how to get their value and also how to derive their value from sine and cosine. But what I want to know is that how did they derive it first time ? How would they think of drawing such a figure ? I would be grateful if you guys provide me with the train of thought which led to the figures and eventually the derivations.
Last edited by Slave (2020-06-21 18:19:51)
Offline
hi Slave
I'm not quite sure what you're after here, but maybe it's this:
So let A+B = P and A-B = Q
Substitute in the above (I've swapped the LHS with the RHS)
Hope that helps,
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I think he asked about how trigonometric angle identities got derived and where did it came ?
"An equation for me has no meaning, unless it expresses a thought of God"- Srinivasa ramanujan
Offline
hi 666bro,
I did wonder that as I posted. I hoped he'd come back if I hadn't given what he wanted.
There's a proof of the compound angle formulas here:
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 28#p389628
There is also a proof using Euclidean geometry (strictly only works for angles under 90). Not sure if it's ever been posted … I think maybe it has. If not I'll do it if somebody asks.
edit: found it
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 88#p410288
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1