You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
How do square roots and exponents work????
hi Jordan123
Welcome to the forum.
I think you're wondering why
Power notation was invented as a shortcut for repeated multiplication
From this we have the three laws for powers:
For all of this it is assumed that m and n are positive integers and they're easy to prove.
But mathematicians don't like limitations like this (the positive integer bit) if it can be avoided. So they have sought to extend the definition whilst maintaining the three laws.
So let's start with "What could a zero power mean?"
From law 2, if m = n we have
But a^m over a^m must be 1, so let's define a^0 to be 1 for all values of a.
Now for a fraction like 1/2
From law 1
So a to the power 1/2 behaves exactly like the square root of a, so let's define it to be that.
There's loads more of this sort of thing, all created definitions based on the three laws. It leads to a whole area of maths that is consistent and useful so it has kind of stuck, And why not?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
hi Jordan123
Welcome to the forum.
I think you're wondering why
Power notation was invented as a shortcut for repeated multiplication
From this we have the three laws for powers:
For all of this it is assumed that m and n are positive integers and they're easy to prove.
But mathematicians don't like limitations like this (the positive integer bit) if it can be avoided. So they have sought to extend the definition whilst maintaining the three laws.
So let's start with "What could a zero power mean?"
From law 2, if m = n we have
But a^m over a^m must be 1, so let's define a^0 to be 1 for all values of a.
Now for a fraction like 1/2
From law 1
So a to the power 1/2 behaves exactly like the square root of a, so let's define it to be that.
There's loads more of this sort of thing, all created definitions based on the three laws. It leads to a whole area of maths that is consistent and useful so it has kind of stuck, And why not?
Bob
Excellent notes. How about a^(3/2)?
This is sqrt{a^3}.
Yes?
Offline
Yes, from the 3rd law:
or alternatively
You can check this out with an example.
Let a = 64
(root 64)^3 = 8^3 = 512
root (64^3) = root(262144) = 512
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Yes, from the 3rd law:
or alternatively
You can check this out with an example.
Let a = 64
(root 64)^3 = 8^3 = 512
root (64^3) = root(262144) = 512
Bob
Honestly, math is simply never-ending education.
Offline
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Yes, I know that the site has links to math notes. The idea for posting threads is to get people involved in mathematical discussion.
Offline
Pages: 1