You are not logged in.
so i want to derive the O(1) algorithm of earth going around the sun(i mean a formula to calculate a smol object orbiting a large object,and only the smol object can get gravity from the large object,and i dont mean something like x²+y²=r² for circle orbits(it has to do with gravity etc,and i want to derive it not graph it and find the pattern(circle)))
so gravity is a function of position(and some constants like gravity constant and big object mass and smol object mass)
gravity sums up(∫) to velocity
velocity sums up to position
but there is a problem!(ik how to do ∫∫s)i see that the pre-integral function has something to do with its integral's integral!
i thought that for a day and did that ∫∫ so i ended up with(i used complex numbers not vectors cuz the |v| function is undifferentiable)
gravity constant*mass(smol object)*mass(big object)*(real part of position of smol object to the third power+im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 3rd power times i)*square root of(re.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power+im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power),and this should end up with re.poposo+im.poposoi
the problem is that i have no idea with how to root this(it has a degree of 3+3+4+4=14!!!)
edit:DIDNT U LISTEN TO PHYSICS CLASS THE GRAVITY FORMULA GIVES U A FORCE NOT AN ACCELERATION YOU 1/8BYTECH
---physics teacher
edit edit:oh sorry i guess that i would have to reintegral it >:C
We are happy to help! But we don't do your homework for you.this is my own question and the physics teacher scolding thing is bc i showed my calculations starting from gravity formula to him
When you post a question:
* Describe your question in the title, so people know if they can help or not ("Please help me" is not a good description).yeah changed
* make it clear what kind of help you want. Do you want just an answer; or a hint of how to get an answer; or more detailed help on a topic.hint of answer,this is not homework so i dont want the answer and no why
* Tell us what level you are at. It will help avoid replies that are too easy or too hard for you to understand.a bit on calculus,have learned integrals and derivatives
* After you've made a post, read it through and check it says what you intended. Edit if necessary before we start solving the wrong problem!yeah
* Please, oh yes PLEASE, come back and read the responses. Then make another post either asking for more clarification or thanking the people who have given up their time freely.does subscribe to this post work?can it give me notifications?
IN SUMMARY: Use a good title, say what help you want, come back and say thanks.
Last edited by imcute (2022-09-29 00:11:32)
Offline
Hi imcute,
What is required? Help? Suggestion? Information?
Be specific.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Hi imcute,
What is required? Help? Suggestion? Information?
Help,and i have said that question
Offline
Hi imcute,
What is required? Help? Suggestion? Information?
Be specific.
Hello?
I know that this isn't an ims but its not an eternity messaging service either
Offline
One ought to wait. Patience!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
One ought to wait. Patience!
its an enternity messaging service after all ((((((
Offline
ganesh wrote:One ought to wait. Patience!
its an enternity messaging service after all ((((((
One ought to be patient.
Forum rule #1.
This is a Forum, it is not instant chat. Leave your message, and come back later (hours or days) to see what responses you got.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
hi imcute
I've only just discovered this thread and I'm having a great deal of difficulty understanding what you are asking.
im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 3rd power times i)*square root of(re.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power+im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power),and this should end up with re.poposo+im.poposoi
Bits like this are not something I understand at all.
In 1609 Kepler published his three laws of planetary motion. Half a century later Newton used his law of universal gravitation to prove them. Is that what you are trying to do? It doesn't involve a 14 degree polynomial and the calculus is relatively straight forward.
Please start again and make it clear what you are trying to achieve. Thanks.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
hi imcute
I've only just discovered this thread and I'm having a great deal of difficulty understanding what you are asking.
im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 3rd power times i)*square root of(re.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power+im.p.o.p.o.s.o to the 4th power),and this should end up with re.poposo+im.poposoi
Bits like this are not something I understand at all.
In 1609 Kepler published his three laws of planetary motion. Half a century later Newton used his law of universal gravitation to prove them. Is that what you are trying to do? It doesn't involve a 14 degree polynomial and the calculus is relatively straight forward.
Please start again and make it clear what you are trying to achieve. Thanks.
Bob
oohay ive redid my math
F=ma=md²r/dt²=Gmm/r²(r is an imaginary number of position)
so we get a second order differential equation d²r/dt²=Gm/r²(the two “small object mass” cancel out)
the problem is that r is a function of time which is the solve to this diff equation
then move every d²r to left and every dt² to right
r²d²r=Gmdt²
integrate both sides
∫∫r²d²r=Gm∫∫dt²
1/3∫r³dr=Gm(mysteriously,nothing is in the right integral so its a moot point and we should ignore it)
r^4/12=Gm
so r=pow(Gm/12,1/4)
what this doesn't tell us is what direction we are going,but atleast we get the linear formula
next we should actually calculate the purely complex number(i.e really complex,like no lack of any part) r
r is replaced with a+bi
<strike>(a+bi)(a+bi)d²(a+bi)=Gmd²t
integrate them
∫∫(a²+2abi-b²)d²(a+bi)=Gm(again,no thing in right integral,so ignore)
∫∫(a³+3a²bi-3ab²-b³i)d²=Gm
∫(1/4a^4+1/2a³b²i-1/2a²b³-1/4b^4i)d=Gm
1/20a^5+1/24a^4b³i-1/24a³b^4-1/20b^5i=Gm
merge likes
(1/20a^5-1/24a³b^4)+(1/24a^4b³-1/20b^5)i=Gm</strike>
whoops wrong math
(a²+b²)d²(a+bi)=Gmd²t
integrate
∫∫(a²+b²)d²(a+bi)=Gm
∫∫(a³+a²bi+b²a-b³)d²=Gm
∫(1/4a^4+1/6a³b²i+1/6b³a²-1/4b^4)d=Gm
(1/20a^5-1/20b^5)+(1/72a^4b³+1/72a³b^4)i=Gm
there it goes
but there is the problem:where is the t?im expecting the varible time in my formula!
also the original problem probably did not involve 5th powers
Offline
imcute wrote:ganesh wrote:One ought to wait. Patience!
its an enternity messaging service after all ((((((
and come back later (hours or days)
but its weeks
Offline
ganesh wrote:imcute wrote:its an enternity messaging service after all ((((((
and come back later (hours or days)
but its weeks
See #8 above in a related post.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline