You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Copy and paste thus url to see question.
https://imgur.com/a/ZSarUyQ
Offline
If you graph this as a function you'll see it only crosses the x axis once so this will factorise into a linear factor and a quadratic one which won't further factorise in real numbers.
Maybe you're confused because you have used x to mean two different things. Let's avoid this by using y and b for the identity:
So y = 3x - 2 and b = 3. This will give you the linear factor and the quadratic cannot be simplified further.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
If you graph this as a function you'll see it only crosses the x axis once so this will factorise into a linear factor and a quadratic one which won't further factorise in real numbers.
Maybe you're confused because you have used x to mean two different things. Let's avoid this by using y and b for the identity:
So y = 3x - 2 and b = 3. This will give you the linear factor and the quadratic cannot be simplified further.
Bob
There is no difference between the formula you provided and the textbook x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2). So, I don't understand your comment about me being confused. I didn't go further in my work.
Let x = (3x - 2)
Let a = 3
When I plug this into your formula and Sullivan's formula, I get stop when I see the answer is something completely different that the answer posted in the back of the textbook.
Offline
There is no difference between the formula you provided and the textbook x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2). So, I don't understand your comment about me being confused. I didn't go further in my work.
Let x = (3x - 2)
the line above is where you use "x" to mean 2 different things: the placeholder in the factorisation formula and also the variable from the original expression
taken literally it says
When I plug this into your formula and Sullivan's formula, I get stop when I see the answer is something completely different that the answer posted in the back of the textbook.
weird
what are you getting?
let formula be
you have
so plug in
Offline
harpazo1965 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/YzIqVO3.jpeg
There is no difference between the formula you provided and the textbook x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2). So, I don't understand your comment about me being confused. I didn't go further in my work.
Let x = (3x - 2)
the line above is where you use "x" to mean 2 different things: the placeholder in the factorisation formula and also the variable from the original expression
taken literally it says
harpazo1965 wrote:When I plug this into your formula and Sullivan's formula, I get stop when I see the answer is something completely different that the answer posted in the back of the textbook.
weird
what are you getting?let formula be
you have
so plug in
Copy and paste to see my work and answer.
https://imgur.com/a/SARLc54
Offline
...my work and answer.
looks good to me
also they both multiply out to the same thing
Offline
harpazo1965 wrote:...my work and answer.
https://i.imgur.com/TZdv1iQ.jpeg
looks good to me
also they both multiply out to the same thing
Did you post my picture?
I don't recall posting this picture.
My cell phone does not accept imgur for some strange reason.
Offline
Pages: 1