You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Consider the equation below which has an upper and lower section.
Upper section: y = 1 if x is rational.
Bottom section: y = 0 if x is irrational.
A. Is this a function?
B. If so, what is its domain and range?
C. Find the x and y intercepts, if any.
D. If it is a function, is it even, odd or neither?
E. How would you describe its graph?
Offline
This is tough to determine. Both the rationals and the irrationals occur everywhere along the number line. I think it is possible to construct a rational that lies between two irrationals, and an irrational between pairs of rationals (I need to check this*).
So the y values keep switching between 0 and 1. (domain and range : easy )
There is a y axis intercept. x axis intercepts keep occurring.
Is it well defined .... if so it is a function. It won't be an odd function as it has no negative y values. Is it even? You need to do the usual test.
If you were able to graph it, it would appear as two horizontal lines but this is an illusion as it is discontinuous everywhere.
Bob
* I'll come back with a more definite answer when I've had time to check.
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
This is tough to determine. Both the rationals and the irrationals occur everywhere along the number line. I think it is possible to construct a rational that lies between two irrationals, and an irrational between pairs of rationals (I need to check this*).
So the y values keep switching between 0 and 1. (domain and range : easy )
There is a y axis intercept. x axis intercepts keep occurring.
Is it well defined .... if so it is a function. It won't be an odd function as it has no negative y values. Is it even? You need to do the usual test.
If you were able to graph it, it would appear as two horizontal lines but this is an illusion as it is discontinuous everywhere.
Bob
* I'll come back with a more definite answer when I've had time to check.
I will let you work on that one, Bob. In the textbook, the equation is set up like a piecewise function.
Offline
I can prove the four results: between two rationals there is always a rational and an irrational, and between two irrationals is always a rational and an irrational.
Not sure if you want that much but it's been good for me.
Can you do any parts now?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I can prove the four results: between two rationals there is always a rational and an irrational, and between two irrationals is always a rational and an irrational.
Not sure if you want that much but it's been good for me.
Can you do any parts now?
Bob
Let me try. Be back later with the right or wrong answers.
Offline
I can prove the four results: between two rationals there is always a rational and an irrational, and between two irrationals is always a rational and an irrational.
Not sure if you want that much but it's been good for me.
Can you do any parts now?
Bob
Visit the following link below. Someone answered this question at algebra.com but some of what he or she said is not clear to me. What do you make of the answer given?
See here:
https://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/Linear-equations/Linear-equations.faq.question.1139600.html
Offline
I agree with all parts. Post which bits are unclear.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I agree with all parts. Post which bits are unclear.
Bob
Sometimes, all it takes is a little searching online.
Offline
Pages: 1