You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The line L is a tangent to the circle
(X^2) + (y^2) = 68 at the pont P
P is the point (2,8)
Work out the equation of the line L
Q. How do we do this without knowing where the centre of the circle is?
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
From the format the centre is (0,0). The general equation is (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2. Centre (a,b)
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
The line L is a tangent to the circle
(X^2) + (y^2) = 68 at the pont P
P is the point (2,8)
Work out the equation of the line LQ. How do we do this without knowing where the centre of the circle is?
Is this precalculus or calculus l?
Offline
@mathxyz
Pre-calculus. GCSE Higher Tier (UK)
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
From the format the centre is (0,0). The general equation is (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2. Centre (a,b)
Bob
Thanks, Bob.
I get that the a and b in the general equation are the centre of the circle, but how do we know a=0, and b=0?
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
(x+a)^2= x^2 + 2ax + a^2
The 2ax term is missing . Only explanation is a=0. Similarly for 2by.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
(x+a)^2= x^2 + 2ax + a^2
The 2ax term is missing . Only explanation is a=0. Similarly for 2by.
Bob
Very cool. Interesting question.
1. More conditional probability today.
2. Tomorrow, maybe, back to my college algebra textbook.
Offline
(x+a)^2= x^2 + 2ax + a^2
The 2ax term is missing . Only explanation is a=0. Similarly for 2by.
Bob
Thanks. Where does (x+a) come from (in the general equation it's x-a)?
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
Yes, sorry I should have said (x-a)^2. But the no "-2xa" still applies.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Yes, sorry I should have said (x-a)^2. But the no "-2xa" still applies.
Bob
Thanks, Bob.
What does, "The -2xa term is missing" mean?
We expanded (x-a)^2 and got x^2-ax-ax+a^2 which simplifies to x^2-2ax+a^2
And then..?
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
hi paulb203
Now compare that with
If these represent the same circle then by subtracting
If this was just a random equation then there are lots of values for x, y, a and b that would work.
But it's for points lying on a circle so we don't have that much freedom.
Because x and y can be lots of values but everything else if fixed, the only way that can work is if a=b=0 thus making the x and y terms disappear.** That means the original equation has r^2 = 68 and centre (0,0).
I've never seen a formal proof for the ** statement; just used it loads of times. I now realise that's not fully satisfactory so I'm going to work on filling in the proper details of a proof. (It's accepted in GCSE without proof) Meanwhile you can use what I've told you to do the problem.
LATER EDIT:
Here's the proof:
If you have {a circle, radius 68 centred on the origin} = statement A
then you can use Pythag to get x^2 + y^2 = 68 {statement B} as the equation.
So A => B
Our problem is does B => A
So we have an equation x^2 + y^2 = 68. Let's say (p,q) is a point satisfying this equation. ie p^2 + q^2 = 68.
As a negative squared gives the same result as the same number but positive squared this means that
(p,-q) (-p,q) and (-p, -q) all also fit the equation.
Join (p,-q) to -p,q) The midpoint of this line is ( (p-p)/2 , (q-q)/2 ) = (0,0). Similarly (0,0) is the midpoint of the line joining (-p,-q) to (p,q).
The distance from (0,0) to each of these points is the same. So all four lie on a circle centred on the origin. But this is true for all p and q fitting the equation. Thus the equation is for a circle, radius 68 centred on (0,0)
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Great answer. Thanks, Bob.
I think I'm getting there, understanding the first part. I'll need to come back for another look. And another
Last edited by paulb203 (2024-05-17 06:40:19)
Prioritise. Persevere. No pain, no gain.
Offline
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Bob
Isn't the equation of a tangent line to a circle a calculus 1 topic?
Offline
This question doesn't need calculus. It does make use of the rule that if m1 times m2 = -1 for gradients of two lines, they are perpendicular.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
This question doesn't need calculus. It does make use of the rule that if m1 times m2 = -1 for gradients of two lines, they are perpendicular.
Bob
Ok. Copy. Nice problem. Interestingly challenging. I will post a few questions later today. Gotta go to the supermarket first.
Last edited by mathxyz (2024-05-19 01:50:23)
Offline
Pages: 1