You are not logged in.
Why is the formula for the area of a circle πr2 and not something else? Is there a deeper mathematical reason behind this seemingly arbitrary formula, or is it just a result of the way we've defined circles and areas?
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Online
The formula for the area of a circle is derived from the integral calculus, which deals with smoothly changing shapes.
Hard to explain otherwise.
World Peace Thru Frisbee
Offline
hi Frank smith
Welcome to the forum.
It's a good question.
If you look here: https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/cir … ctors.html
you'll see a way to establish the formula by dividing a circle into sectors and letting the number of sectors become infinite.
But there's still a question because this method uses the formula for the circumference, so is there a proof for this too?
I cannot find one on the MIF site; I'm sure you could 'google' it.
I've got a method that works out the perimeter of a regular polygon and lets the number of sides tend to infinity so the polygon becomes a circle.
It uses sin(x) tends to x as x tends to zero (x in radians). There a justification* for that here:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/radians.html
* The method I learnt at school uses the formula for circumference so it isn't suitable here as it creates a circular argument (no pun intended).
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline