Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#26 2024-07-18 21:40:40

KerimF
Member
From: Aleppo-Syria
Registered: 2018-08-10
Posts: 225

Re: Possible 'new knowledge'

I am 75 and math is my favorite since I was teen.
Although I still enjoy working with numbers and equations in designing various products in electronics, I can no more be interested in fields not related to my work.
In these hard days, I am a poor boss who tries his best to gain his daily bread and of his few assistants despite the lack of electricity and fuel.

When I was younger and living in the past golden years, having the chance to study and apply, in some ways, your interesting work would have been a great gift to me.


Every living thing has no choice but to execute its pre-programmed instructions embedded in it (known as instincts).
But only a human may have the freedom and ability to oppose his natural robotic nature.
But, by opposing it, such a human becomes no more of this world.

Offline

#27 2024-08-18 08:05:34

woodturner550
Member
Registered: 2024-06-08
Posts: 25

Re: Possible 'new knowledge'

By now it is hard to believe that the government (NSA, NIST) does not know about this ‘new math knowledge’.

Question, Why would they NOT even acknowledge the ‘new math knowledge? Have not even reply to emails.

Offline

#28 2024-08-19 00:28:15

KerimF
Member
From: Aleppo-Syria
Registered: 2018-08-10
Posts: 225

Re: Possible 'new knowledge'

woodturner550 wrote:

By now it is hard to believe that the government (NSA, NIST) does not know about this ‘new math knowledge’.

Question, Why would they NOT even acknowledge the ‘new math knowledge? Have not even reply to emails.

They surely have their good reasons to play ignorance, openly in the least, though they are surely not less intelligent than we are smile
I am afraid that one has to be rich (I mean rich really) or is serving a powerful rich group to be acknowledged as a first step.

For instance, I didn't hear yet of a well-known inventor, in the human history, who wasn't of a rich family or wasn't serving a rich group (a company).
I mean, this is life since always, we like it or not.
Simply speaking, what is happening to you is natural. It also happens to any other ordinary person around the world (as I, for example). This is why every time I try to find/discover something new, I see if it can be useful to me in the first place, because the world has no time to listen to me big_smile

Anyway, I hope that such negative reactions don't prevent you to keep thinking of new ideas.


Every living thing has no choice but to execute its pre-programmed instructions embedded in it (known as instincts).
But only a human may have the freedom and ability to oppose his natural robotic nature.
But, by opposing it, such a human becomes no more of this world.

Offline

#29 2024-09-10 08:17:28

woodturner550
Member
Registered: 2024-06-08
Posts: 25

Re: Possible 'new knowledge'

while count < number_of_needed_numbers:
    start_time = time.time()  # get first time   first time for beauty of math
    print("start time ", start_time)
    time.sleep(0.00000000000001)  # wait
    end_time = time.time()  # get second time    second time for beauty of math
    print("end time ", end_time)
    low_time = ((end_time + start_time) / 2)  # covert to one time
    print("low time ", low_time)
    start_time1 = time.time()  # get third time     third time for beauty of math
    print("start time1 ", start_time1)
    time.sleep(0.00000000000001)  # wait
    end_time1 = time.time()  # get fourth time     fourth time for beauty of math
    print("end time1 ", end_time1)
    high_time = ((end_time1 + start_time1) / 2)  # convert to one time
    print("high time ", high_time)
    random.seed((high_time + low_time) / 2)  # convert to one time for seed
    random_number = random.randint(lowest_random_number_needed, highest_random_number_needed)
    count += 1
    print(random_number)


Add first and second time, then divide by two. The answer is column D top. Add third and fourth time, then divide by two. The answer is column D bottom.
Now take the two times in D and add them, then divide by two for REAL SEED.
Explanation about the seed. To use time as a seed, you must get all the data for time as done above. If you use only one time you have failed to get the ¾ of “TIME.” It takes all four to get a usable time.
Binary is 0 and 1. The Mean is 0.5. The upper set is for zero, middle of the “seed” is Mean or 0.5, bottom set is for one. The complete time.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB