You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi i need help with this question:
Let G be the symmetric group S3.
a)What are the orders of elements of G?
b)Show that G contains just one subgroup of order 3 and three subgroups of order 2
Thanks in advance
Offline
S[sub]3[/sub] has six elements: 1, (12), (13), (23), (123), (132).
Their orders are 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3 respectively.
The subgroup of order 3 contains 1, (123), (132). The subgroups of order 2 are {1,(12)}, {1,(13)}, {1,(23)}.
Offline
thanks alot!
Offline
Their orders are 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3 respectively.
In general, a k-cycle has order k. So (12) is a 2-cycle, and thus, has order 2.
The subgroup of order 3 contains 1, (123), (132). The subgroups of order 2 are {1,(12)}, {1,(13)}, {1,(23)}.
I'm not sure that fully answers the question. Mustn't we also show it isn't possible to have any more subgroups of order 3 and 2?
For any subgroup of order 3, as it is prime, it must be cyclic and it can be generated by any of it's elements. Thus, each element in a subgroup of order 3 must have order 3 (other than the identity). The one subgroup of order 3 is {1, (123), (132)}. If there is another subgroup of order three, then there must be some element of S3 that is not in here and of order three. The previous question shows that such an element does not exist, and so there are no more subgroups of order three.
This same logic can be applied to subgroups of order 2, and in fact, and subgroup of order p.
But perhaps this is overkill.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Wouldn't the elements be:
(123) (123) (123)
(123) (132) (213)
(123) (123) (123)
(231) (312) (321)
Offline
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with the grouping, freddogtgj.
But notice that (123), (231), and (312) are all the same exact element, as p(1) = 2, p(2) = 3, and p(3) = 1 for each of them, so they are all the same permutation (sends the inputs to the same places).
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Pages: 1