Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2007-10-02 12:39:18

Kurtz
Member
Registered: 2007-10-01
Posts: 27

Overcoming Friction

I don't know what formula I should be using for this equation. :|

A girl on a sled coasts down a hill. Her speed is 7.0 m/s when she reaches level ground at the bottom. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled's runners and the hard, icy snow is 0.050, and the girl and sled together weigh 645 N. How far does the sled travel on the level ground before coming to rest?


I am a mathemagician. You ask why? I point up

Offline

#2 2007-10-02 13:27:34

JaneFairfax
Member
Registered: 2007-02-23
Posts: 6,868

Re: Overcoming Friction

The retarding force is 0.050 × 645 = 32.25 N. The mass of the girl & sled is 645 ∕ 9.8 ≈ 65.82 kg. Hence the deceleration is 32.25 ∕ 65.82 = 0.49 ms[sup]−2[/sup].

Use the equation

to find s.

Offline

#3 2007-10-02 13:31:45

Kurtz
Member
Registered: 2007-10-01
Posts: 27

Re: Overcoming Friction

Thank you so much for helping me.


I am a mathemagician. You ask why? I point up

Offline

#4 2007-10-02 13:36:42

John E. Franklin
Member
Registered: 2005-08-29
Posts: 3,588

Re: Overcoming Friction

Forget the 645 Newtons, that cancels out with the mass during deceleration.
(Someone's not gonna like that statement, but you might have to work
that part out the right way, sorry, can't remember)
The speed (V) of the sled with respect to time (t) is probably (if I remember right):
V = 7 - (0.050)(9.8)t, where time (t) = 0 when she reaches level ground.
Inorder to get distance travelled, you can integrate with respect to time (t).
DIST = 7t - (1/2)(0.050)(9.8)t^2
First find when Velocity (V) = 0
0 = V = 7 - (0.050)(9.8)t
t = 14 and 2/7ths seconds
Plug 14.28 number into time (t) in DISTance formula.
DIST = 100 - 50 meters = 50 meters I guess.  Hope I did it right.
Now the force in Newtons (N) = F = ma = mg = 9.8(mass)
There's some formulas you will need to do this right.


igloo myrtilles fourmis

Offline

#5 2007-10-02 22:21:47

JaneFairfax
Member
Registered: 2007-02-23
Posts: 6,868

Re: Overcoming Friction

You’re right in that the deceleration does not depend on the weight or mass of the girl and sled. I didn’t know this before but I can see why now.

But why bring time into the equation? Just use the time-independent equation of motion I gave in my post above.

Last edited by JaneFairfax (2007-10-03 06:43:02)

Offline

#6 2007-10-03 04:07:37

John E. Franklin
Member
Registered: 2005-08-29
Posts: 3,588

Re: Overcoming Friction

Since it takes me ten minutes to do my shabby posts sometimes when I'm interrupted at home, you can conclude from the times on the posts, that I was unaware of your post as I was still posting at the time.  But also, I love to do things 50 different ways since my memory is so bad, I'm hoping that one of the ways will actually get stuck in my head, or somehow, some connection will be found that makes it easier for me to do the next time.


igloo myrtilles fourmis

Offline

#7 2007-10-17 05:55:20

mathsyperson
Moderator
Registered: 2005-06-22
Posts: 4,900

Re: Overcoming Friction

This way might involve less work.

Energy = Force x Distance, ∴ Distance = Energy/Force.

E = (1/2)mv²; F = μmg, ∴ D = (1/2)v²/μg = 50 metres.


Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB