You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
An avatar is a small image that will be displayed under your username in your posts. It must not be any bigger than 80 x 80 pixels and 10240 bytes (10 KB).
Could be this changed a little bit?
Like 100 x 100 pixels and 40 KB?
Offline
100x100 does not seem too bad, but the "kb" can slow load times for dial-up connections ... let us ask the members what they think.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Okay.
For example this inocent image
Dimensions: 100 x 75
Size: 38,6 KB
Offline
Becomes 6k (click to see properly). So the kb of the image can be reduced to comply with 10k ... and we could increase dimensions to 100x100 if people agree
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Choose this one 'cause I made it for you!
PNG's work too!
Click on the picture to get it clearer!!! Very important!!
Then save it.
Last edited by John E. Franklin (2007-10-15 21:29:40)
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
I think the width could easily go to 150 without disrupting things. Height means more scrolling, and increasing both width and height may encourage large/dominating images.
Opinions anyone?
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Mmm... I see people are not giving many opinions.
So, can you increase the dimensions?
What about the size?
Offline
I wouldn't mind 150x100, but then we don't know what internet other people are using.
Offline
I say we should narrow it back down to how the size was originally; 60x60. That's how I like it.
Why do avatars need to be big?
Offline
i say make no limit! (just kidding, hey, even smart people have weird thoughts!)
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
I agree!! Increase width to 111 and height backdown to 77.
Any existing avatar at 78, 79, or 80, will be sent an email to
tell them to fix it soon.
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
i have a 110 x 75 pic... it's really cool. I think 111 max height is good, but maybe 112?
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
i think 100x100 is enough if we lowered it down to 60x60 like devantÆ says then we will never get cool avatars............ does anyone have ideas?
Zappzter - New IM app! Unsure of which room to join? "ZNU" is made to help new users. c:
Offline
My vote is 120x80, but still a max of 10kb for performance reasons
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
well i have a cool avatar which is 100x100 people has more 100x100 than 120x80 'cause it's harder to find 120x80 ones
Zappzter - New IM app! Unsure of which room to join? "ZNU" is made to help new users. c:
Offline
Why not increase the efficiency of the forum board? 60x60 gets my vote, but 40x40 or 25x25 would be good.
Oh, and disallowing animated avatars would also be a start.
Offline
NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
100X100 and ALLOWING AMINATED AVATARS
1000000000% HAS MY VOTE!!!
Last edited by lightning (2007-10-18 05:53:43)
Zappzter - New IM app! Unsure of which room to join? "ZNU" is made to help new users. c:
Offline
101% is the same... actually, literally.
I also vote for animated avatars.
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
yeah
sooo 101x101 and aminated avatars
they so get my vote
Zappzter - New IM app! Unsure of which room to join? "ZNU" is made to help new users. c:
Offline
n = {0 .. 30}
120 x 80 >= (100 + 20 + n) x (100 - 20 - n)
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
huh???
Zappzter - New IM app! Unsure of which room to join? "ZNU" is made to help new users. c:
Offline
so... what were you trying to say again?
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
n = {0 .. 30}
120 x 80 >= (100 + 20 + n) x (100 - 20 - n)
That is a nice discovery.
Offline
Pages: 1