You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Use the method of writing each premise in symbols in order to write a conclusion that yields a valid argument.
If I get robbed, I will go to court. I got robbed.
a. I will get robbed in court.
b. I will not go to court.
c. I will go to court.
d. I will not get robbed in court
Offline
Let:
p = I got robbed.
q = I will go to court.
We have:
Since p is true, the implication is that q is true. Therefore (c.), I will go to court.
Offline
So are you saying that "I get robbed" and "I got robbed" are both representative of "p"?
Offline
Wow! I see the logic now. Funny. Its seemed so vague just a while ago. Man it is amazing how little one can accomplish under stress. Once one relaxes things seem so much plainer.
Offline
If I get robbed, I will go to court. I got robbed.
In the first part of the sentence the person is contemplating whereas the other part of the sentence talks about the occurrence of the event. The argument should spring from the first part of the sentence as everything here is central to his contemplation.
Regards
Khushboo
Last edited by Khushboo (2007-10-30 19:41:43)
Offline
When your under stress things seem more complicated.i got it right though.Thanks.
Offline
what the heck does that mean? i choose c
Man, what a pain...
Offline
Pages: 1