You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Last edited by tony123 (2007-11-11 07:05:52)
Offline
Edit: This is wrong! But what an elegant problem it would be if my solution was correct!
From this, we can see that only
will work.Last edited by Identity (2007-11-13 02:14:57)
Offline
tony123,
Squaring both sides,
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Ganesh. If you square both sides, the left-hand side is
Be careful!
Offline
JaneFairfax,
This is what I get!
Okay, Lets use the substitution method!
Let
The original equation becomes
squaring both sides,
Feed this back in the original equation,
PS:- Struggling with LaTeX! Its been a long break! I refer the tags! When I don't I make mistakes! I shall learn very soon!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
sorry ganesh
i think there is still mistake.
http://gyan.talkacademy.com.np
Offline
gyanashreshta,
Mistake in Exponents?
Operation of Exponents?
Or is it only the LaTeX?
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
what if we let y = (x)^(x^1/2)-1/2=o and solve it graphically?
i think
(that the answer will be the intersection of x axis and the curve line given by the new equation.)
Last edited by gyanshrestha (2007-11-12 01:02:17)
http://gyan.talkacademy.com.np
Offline
ganesh, you're still making the same mistake. You're right that
but remember that
Identity, you also made a slight error.
Instead, we need to do this:
Wrap it in bacon
Offline
TheDude,
I shall check again in leisure!
Thanks, all of you, for correcting me!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
i don't know the general solution of this equation. the trivial solution is x = 1/4.
http://gyan.talkacademy.com.np
Offline
i don't know the general solution of this equation. the trivial solution is x = 1/4.
very nice inspection, similarly you can find the solution
Using logs, I arrived at
It looks as if the graph of the RHS is a convex graph, so the graphs only intersect twice.
But it would be awesome if someone posted an analytic solution...
Offline
can we say that if x^x = a^a, then x=a?i if then
above equation can be simplified to
x^x=1/16
and x^x = (1/4)^(1/4)
then we can say that x = 1/4
http://gyan.talkacademy.com.np
Offline
Sorry gyanshrestha, but x^x = a^a does not imply x = a. Consider: 0^0 = 1 = 1^1.
Also, (1/4)^(1/4) != 1/16. (1/4)^2 = 1/16.
Last edited by TheDude (2007-11-15 00:48:22)
Wrap it in bacon
Offline
0^0 is indeterminate, so you can't say it's equal to 1.
Also, x^x = a^a does imply that x=a is a solution, it just doesn't guarantee that there aren't others.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Offline
Good point mathsyperson, I should have been more clear.
saudi_boy, you're making the same mistake ganesh made above.
Wrap it in bacon
Offline
Pages: 1