You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I'm working on some tougher derivatives.
1.
and
2.
, x is in the Reals-----------------------------
For #1:
I tried to look at it two separate ways as x>0 and x<0.
I figured if x<0 then:
Does this make sense? It seems too easy?
STUCK PRETTY MUCH COMPLETELY ON #2.
Offline
For #1,
You meant to say "if x>0" then x * x, so positive slope.
You meant to say " if x<0" then x * -x, so positive slope still.
Nice twisted parabola, like a cubic!!!
Nice work, just a typo.
For #2,
here's a graph, but you probably already have a graph.
and, it mirrors to the negative x the same positive way in the y-dimension.
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/768/xsinesquaredxve3.png
On, #2, I noted that this function has
a similar graph, but perhaps not the same exactly.
y = x/2 - x/2* cos(2* pi * x)
versus your: y = x * sin(pi * x)*sin(pi * x)
Last edited by John E. Franklin (2008-02-07 17:30:53)
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
1.
2.
You know why
, dont you?Last edited by JaneFairfax (2008-02-07 21:50:11)
Offline
Pages: 1