You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I used an u-substitution and then integration by parts and I got -5/4
This was in a timed quiz so I had hurry and im not sure I got it right? Is my answer correct? If not, how do you do it then?
Last edited by LuisRodg (2008-02-18 05:19:24)
Offline
I haven't done this yet, so don't take my word for anything, but wouldn't the answer have to be positive, as the whole curve (and so the section of the curve between 0 and 1) is above the x-axis?
Last edited by Daniel123 (2008-02-18 05:30:28)
Offline
One of the dangerous things with integration by parts is forgetting that dang negative sign. I got that it's 1/4.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Can't you just plug it into the 89?
Offline
Not allowed any form of calculator in quizzes or tests. Makes sense though. I want to learn how to do it myself not plug it in some calculator.
Offline
This is just from a few minutes of scribbling, but I got it as ln(2) - 1/4.
I'll double-check later.
Edit: Wait, I get 1/4 after all. I did exactly what Ricky warned about. >_>
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Let's perform a double integration solution:
The rest follows. Easy, huh ¿?
Offline
I do not follow that approach since I havent been introduced to double integrals yet.
Offline
lol! has everyone gone nuts? Double integrals?
Let u = ln(x + 1)
let dv = x dx
its easy as pi!
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
yes the final solution , in my opinion, 1/4
you need to use integration by parts
lol! has everyone gone nuts? Double integrals?
Let u = ln(x + 1)
let dv = x dx
its easy as pi!
then use substitution with (x+1)=u in second term of integral ( du*v)
if you don't understand yet
i can help you more
tell me my brother if you get
Offline
And now for the new integral?
Last edited by LuisRodg (2008-03-30 13:41:08)
Offline
There are two ways you could do the new integral:
1. Use the substitution u = x + 1
2. Use long division twice, leaving you with three terms that are easy to integrate (much nicer )
Last edited by Daniel123 (2008-03-30 22:57:09)
Offline
after long division it becomes
(1/2)x^2(ln(x+1)) - (1/2)[∫x-1 dx + ∫(1/(x+1)) dx
Offline
Pages: 1