You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
can anyone give an example of a linear map such that Im(f)=Ker(f)
im(f)=image of f
ker(f)=kernal of f
Offline
What is the kernel of a linear transformation? Once you answer this, you'll see that there is really only one such linear map, and it should be rather straightforward as to what it is.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Are you sure? I'd have thought there are lots, unless I'm misremembering my definitions.
For example, f: R² --> R²; f(x,y) = (0,x) would be one, but there are plenty of others.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
The image of your mapping is 0 x R, the kernel is (0,0).
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
I'm not sure where you think I'm wrong, so here's my reasoning:
For a map f: X --> Y, I remember kernel to be defined as:
Using the f in my previous post, f(0,y) --> (0,0) for any y.
Therefore Im(f) = ker(f)
???
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Ah, you're right. I was not considering mapping between spaces of different dimensions.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Pages: 1