You are not logged in.
Got some problems with my textbook's wording
What does it mean by "For all but finitely many"? is there an equivalent way to word it?
What does it mean by adjoined? Rudin didn't explain this term in his book
Thanks in advance : )
sorry for the late reply, what I dont understand is that it seems to be a group of under module something but it doesnt say anything
hmm that's an interesting proposition, first I doubted it because I overlooked the requirement that G is a group itself
somehow I feel that this problem's information is very insuffient, but I guess any set containing p+q can be eliminated.
the answer is e.
Yea, I agree that I have to restrict it, so that I have to C&P the entire thing
then Mathsyperson's solution should be the best
since C&P a portion of it, doesnt sound possible when the number is huge
Looks like you are using 1, as the base
I put n=1 into my formula's, then I got
2^13 = 8192,
number = 2+13*2+2=30
oh yeah, I should have made it clear, that you could paste any portion of the As, if not, its hard to make it to 10000 precisely
sorry about that
So its like, when you pass 5000, you could reach 10000 in one copy and paste....
but wait, that doesnt sound really realistic...I think your solution might be the best
I came up with this when I was playing games on my comp
It goes like this: What is the least number of operations it takes to type 10000 letters A. (You have two operations, just by pressing "A" , or copy&Paste. Pressing "A" counts as 1 operation, Copy and Paste counts as 2)
I don't know if this can be generalized, I think the solution would be different for large number opposed to the small number of A
I think the least number of operation, goes like,
First type
thats as far as I can get : (
How to prove that
my book said it follows from
andI think it might just be algebra, but still,
hey, I just found it. Its scalar tripple product [A,B,C] = A dot (B cross C). Ah, learned it before but didnt use that notation much, forgot hahah
thanks anyway : )
I read this in one of my book
Let gamma be a curve of class larger than 2, with arc length s as parameter.......
the equation of the osulating plane is
What is this notation with the brackets , [ ...., ....., ....]=0 ? Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance
I corrected a typo in my last line, the last term was x_j and it is now x_n.
This is not a definition, it's just using the standard definition of matrix multiplication on the vector (0, ..., 1, ..., 0).
So it could have been row(j) elements, but they are equivalent?
No, whenever doing matrix multiplication (i.e. applying a linear transformation), vectors are always column vectors.
oh, ok. Got it. later I saw the author used put the eigen vectors in columns instead of rows. Thanks : )
So this is just a definition. He wrote that vector in term of basis x_i with corresponding column(j) elements. So it could have been row(j) elements, but they are equivalent?
What book?
Mathematics of Classical and Quantum physics by Fredrick W.Byron, Jr. and Robert W.Fuller
Oh, I think I know what's going on, he defines
(Summation is assumed)
I think its normally this
ok, here's my version of proof
sorry if I made any mistakes
I was trying to find the surface element of a sphere with radius R
Then I just did a jacobian transformation
and I dont think I got the correct result : (
Anyone know why? Thanks in advance
1-2(2x+1)=1-(x-1)
1-(2*2x+2*1)=1-x+1
1-(4x+2)=(1+1)-x
1-4x-2=2-x
(1-2)-4x=2-x
-1-4x=2-x
(-1-2)=(4x-x)
-3=3x
x=-1
so the region would be y^2<x<4 , 0<y<2, graph it and express the region in different way
then you get, 0<x<4, 0<y< square root (x) , then u go on and reverse the order
*can somebody check if I did it correctly *
thats what I get, but I dont know lol
But it becomes much trickier if you follow the commonly used rule that different letters must have different numbers.
There are 10 different letters in the equation, so all 10 digits are used.
That's all I have so far.
Oh yeah, didnt see that
R E A D
T H I S
P A G E
Ok then, since all 10 digits are used
every addition: (k_1,k,k_2 = 0 or 1)
D+S =10k+E
A+I+k =10K_1+G
E+H+K_1= 10k_2 + A
R+T+k_2=P
(like, 6+7=10+3, so the k would be 1 here)
(k,k1,k2)= (0,0,0), (0,1,1,),(1,1,1)....... 2x2x2=8 pairs......
thats all I got so far, wait...
and E appear in PAGE, and READ, so is A
therefore, D+S >10, E+H >10 , then k=1, k_2=1
so
D+S =10+E
A+I+1 =10K_1+G
E+H+K_1= 10 + A
R+T+1=P
I think its much easier from here on
its not that hard, cuz only A and E repeat themselve, so , give random values to A and E and solve for others
To me, Math is not science
Science is the study of this world
but you CANT find math in the world , cant find a matter called "2"
It only exists in the world conceptual in our brains
leads to , does consciousness , thoughts count as substance?
Math is like coming from some other world only connects with our consciousness?
so to prove
It's not valid to split it to
so the only way to do it is
so it diverages
Oh, I see. Thanks guys
Assuming there's no energy loss due to friction?
I think the work by father = the potential energy