Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2009-05-15 02:31:18

Aquafina
Member
Registered: 2009-05-15
Posts: 3

Proof by Induction?

Hi I want to show that for x>3

(x^5 - 1)/(x-1) ≠ y^2

where y is any integer

basically the expression is not a perfect square

I've tried proof by induction but can't seem to get anywhere

Offline

#2 2009-05-20 00:29:24

TheDude
Member
Registered: 2007-10-23
Posts: 361

Re: Proof by Induction?

Are you sure you're supposed to use induction?  It may be possible, but don't see a good way of solving the problem with it.  I would go for a more direct approach.

First, let's simplify the expression.  The LHS is equal to

for all x other than x=1.  Since we're only interested in x>3, we can use this simplification.

Let's assume that this expression is a perfect square.  That means we can factor it as follows:

Solve for a, b, c:


Wrap it in bacon

Offline

#3 2009-05-20 05:43:20

Kurre
Member
Registered: 2006-07-18
Posts: 280

Re: Proof by Induction?

no, a value for a polynomial can be a perfect square, without the polynomial being a perfect square of a polynomial...

Offline

#4 2009-05-20 11:52:04

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: Proof by Induction?

Hi Kurre;

  I'm not following you. When x=3, f(3) = 121 is a square.

Last edited by bobbym (2009-05-20 17:13:04)


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

#5 2009-05-20 12:58:24

Avon
Member
Registered: 2007-06-28
Posts: 80

Re: Proof by Induction?

bobbym wrote:

I'm not following you. When x=3, f(3) = 121 a square.

This exactly illustrates Kurre's point. TheDude's post presents a proof that the polynomial

is not the square of a polynomial.
Nevertheless,
is a square.

Offline

#6 2009-05-20 17:16:39

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: Proof by Induction?

Sorry Kurre and thanks Avon;

I get it now. So, the original question still remains unproved?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB