You are not logged in.
I just answered it.
Your math knowledge? We are getting to that.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Do you think GFology is a good book?
Wow,I have unintentionally helped you in getting to the point you want.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
I think the first 2 or 3 chapters is good but after that he gets mathematicosis.
But we are getting off the point. Please stick to the conversation.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Mathematicosis? I enjoyed the one about snake oil and WZ algorithm.
Okay,continue your story.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Then I learned an important thing. The difference between a school problem and a real world problem. Knowing when the problem needed a computer and when it did not. Just as gAr told you.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Ok,so,is tgat just an "instinct" or somwthing that you can check "procedurally"?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Nope, you can know the difference by inspection, here is an extremely simple one:
Which is which?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Well,in the first one we can easily apply a hand method,but in the second one it is not as easy,so a computer would be a nice companion on the second one.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, correct.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
The order is the same.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
They are not the same. One is easy in your head the other requires a calculator or computer. Do you ask for hand method there?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
That is not what I meant. The order is the same as the last one you gave me,in that the first is again the one that uses a hand method Nd the second doesn't
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Sorry, that answer was too cryptic for me. But how about the other question?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I could actually use a hand method on the second one as well and it would give me the result in a fairly good time.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Really, you have so much free time then. If you were working in some installations you would be terminated for doing that by hand. Also it highly unlikely that you would get the correct answer.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Actually,I would get the precise digits. Not all of course,but however many I needed.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
I need 1000 digits, care to work on it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
What do you need them for?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
You are avoiding the answer. You can not get them by hand. You would go to mathematica, maple, sage, mupad, maxima, derive, axiom, wolfram, lisp etc for the answer. You would also trust the answer. You would not demand to see a proof, no one would.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I am not. E.g. It would be silly to ask for that square root if all you want is to know its square.
But,if I would really have to calculate the sqrt to 1000 I would go to a computer.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Of course you would. I am only pointing out the difference between a problem that would appear in a textbook and a problem that would appear in industrial, scientific or recreational math.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Ok. What else do you need to say?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
It became clear that school math problems are formulated to be easy to compute with pencil and paper and illustrate a supposed mathematical truth. They are like a story with a moral to it.
A problem that occurs in the real world has none of the above characteristics. It is most likely difficult or impossible to compute with pencil and paper. It does not illustrate the chapter heading.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I remember the integral you showed me. I entered it into WA and it gave out an answer,but it is impossible to do by school methods.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Another question:
If you were to create a random integral would it be more likely to be done by hand methods or not?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline