You are not logged in.
Hi cooljackiec
I found that these numbers satisfy Q2.
I sort of see what you are doing here, but then again, I don't quite understand. We try to make sure that no numbers in our set are the arithemtic mean of two others. I've been suggested to use base 3, but I don't know how that would work.
EDIT: Turn our set into base 3 integers. Selecting those expressed with only 0 and 1 (base 3) gives us 2^k integers. I think this works, but I have to prove that this satisfies the condition of one number not being the AM of 2 others.
Last edited by cooljackiec (2014-06-16 17:03:59)
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
That is correct.
Now, think about what a sum of two such number looks like and what twice a such number looks like.
Also, did you see post #25?
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2014-06-16 22:07:21)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
The sum of two numbers (in base 3) will have a 2 digit?? Is that what you're saying?
also, 32 is not correct
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
It is correct that it will have the digit 2, but what's more imortant is that it will always have a 1. Compare that to a double of a number from the sequence.
Hm, you have the correct answer for Q1?
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2014-06-17 04:42:52)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
yea, i got the 2nd question, but not the 1st.
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
Do you know what the answer is to Q1?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
nope
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
Then, how do you know it's not 32?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
The decimal representation of m/n, where m and n are relatively prime positive integers and m<n, contains the digits 2, 5, and 1 consecutively, and in that order. Find the smallest value of n for which this is possible.
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
I thought that 999 was the answer at first. 800 yields 0.25125. Maybe there's something else in the problem I didn't comprehend. I'm going to get some clarification
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
What happened for the first question?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
so apparently, we can have 2513 and stuff. So like we just need 251 in order and then can have extra digits. 251 /999 is interesting, because 251 is close to 250, a divisor of 1000, which is cllose to 999.
Anyways, idk about the 1st quesiton
EDIT: we don't need to have a repeated decimal
Last edited by cooljackiec (2014-06-20 08:35:21)
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
Offline
so apparently, we can have 2513 and stuff
In that case we can get
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym
That seems the smallest so far.
Hi cooljackiec
Well, I asked you multiple times how you know the answer is not 32, without a respense.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi anonimnystefy;
The older I get the more I demand rigor. Not in the answer like math types do, but in the question itself!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, I have noticed.
Do you think there is a smaller answer?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
M does not think so. The last time I disagreed with M and I was right was in July 2001...
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hm, how did M get that answer?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
It just found a smaller one with an improvement in the logic.
and another one
and another
No mas?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
How did you get those?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Did you see the last one?
FindInstance[{m > 0, n > 0, Floor[1000 m/n] == 251, n < 127,
m != n}, {m, n}, Integers]
Got to go eat!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Bon appétit!
That code seems to be slightly incomplete, but fortunately, it does not change the answer.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline